# Specification Quality Checklist: KMP Recommended Project Structure Alignment

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2025-07-15 (updated with blog post context)
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- The Architecture section references specific plugin names, DSL block names, and file paths because this is a build infrastructure feature — these are the "domain concepts" of the feature, not implementation details. The spec remains technology-agnostic regarding *how* the migration is executed.
- The "Design Standards Compliance" section was intentionally removed as this feature has zero UI impact.
- Gap analysis is based on a concrete audit of all 30+ modules — findings are documented in the Architecture section.
- All checklist items pass. Spec is ready for `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`.
